-
- Burkas and Birkins vs. Dear Guy Who Just Made My Burrito
- Cutting Essays
- Generic vs. Specific
- “Realness” of the piece
- Getting into the head of the thing being ridiculed
- Personal Attack vs. Object or group
- Possibly more insulting to insult just the Burrito guy vs. the entire cast and plot of Sex and the City 2
- Stakes: Feminism vs. Burrito
- Does it all depend on your own sense of what “cutting” means?
- Anger vs. cutting
- High or low humor (punching up vs. down)
- Tipping point where you’re laughing at the narrator not the subject
- Redirection of ridicule might come back to narrator; may keep piece moving
- Ebert Reviews
- Reminds us of authority of the speaker
- Makes and unexpected connection/comparison
- It looks as if [unexpected, insane combination]
- We all know….
- Start bad, go worse
- Slow build
- Broadens the stakes
- Pretend compliment inessential things
- Worry for audience/consumer
- Finds some metric for zero, then goes below it (ie bottom of the barrel
- Direct focus to more peripheral element
- Question actors/participants’ judgement
- Comparison
- Understatement
- Have to try to be this bad
- Tone of disappointment
- Say back the facts out of context
- Say things that seems like exaggerations but aren’t
- Compliment things that aren’t achievements
- Go surreal
- So bad I can’t do my job
- “Flashy phrase” gives you authority to ridicule
- Burkas and Birkins vs. Dear Guy Who Just Made My Burrito
- Rakoff, on Rent
- Option of writing yourself into the review
- Personal story alongside critique then ties it together
- Cutting at the assumptions, not just the surface
- Flat, short declarations as first lines often are very effective
- X has done Y
- Mad Dog Time should…
- Too graphic is distracting from the humor you’re trying to get across
- Need to lay the groundwork for an intense punchline